What
I Think About Senator Kerry By JEREMIAH DENTON
03/07/04 Knowing that I served in the
U.S. Senate with John Kerry and that, like him, I am a veteran of the Vietnam
War, many people have asked me what I think of him, particularly now that he's
the apparent presidential nominee of the Democratic Party.
When Kerry joined me in the Senate, I already knew about his record of defamatory
remarks and behavior criticizing U.S. policy in Vietnam and the conduct of our
military personnel there. I had learned in North Vietnamese prisons how much harm
such statements caused. Try Our Classifieds To me, his remarks
and behavior amounted to giving aid and comfort to our Vietnamese and Soviet
enemies. So I was not surprised when his subsequent overall voting pattern
in the Senate was consistently detrimental to our national security.
Considering his demonstrated popularity during the Democratic primaries, I
earnestly hope the American people will soberly consider Kerry's qualifications
for the presidency in light of his position and record on both our cultural war
at home and on national security issues. To put it bluntly, John
Kerry exemplifies the very reasons that I switched to the Republican Party.
Like the majority in his political party, he has proven by his words and actions
that his list of priorities -- his ideas on what most needs to be done to improve
this country -- are almost opposite to my own. Here are two issue
areas that I consider top priorities: the war over the soul of America, and
national security. Top priority should be placed on an effort to
recover our most fundamental founding belief that our national objectives,
policies and laws should reflect obedience to the will of Almighty God. Our Declaration
of Independence, our national Constitution and each of the states' constitutions
stress that basic American national principle. For about 200 years,
the entire country, both parties and all branches of government understood that
principle and tried to follow it, if imperfectly. For some 50 years,
our nation's opinion-makers, our courts and, gradually, our politicians have
been abandoning our historical effort to be "one nation under God"
in favor of becoming "one nation without God," with glaringly unfavorable
results. I believe our political leaders, educational system, parents
and opinion-makers must all return to teaching the truth most emphasized by our
Founding Fathers. George Washington called religious belief indispensable
to the prosperity of our democracy. William Penn said, "Men must choose
to be governed by God or condemn themselves to be ruled by tyrants."
And when asked what caused the Civil War, President Lincoln said, "We
have forgotten God." In these days we have not only forgotten
God, we are by our new standards of government and culture rejecting him
as the acknowledged creator and as the endower of our rights.
As a result, we are suffering cultural decay and human unhappiness. The decline
of the institution of the family is the most obvious result. Perhaps
the current movie, "The Passion of the Christ," will help many to
come to realize the cost of the redemption of our sins, and the destructiveness
of sin. Let's remember that over 95 percent of Americans during
our founding days were Christians, and though our Founding Fathers stipulated
that no one was to be compelled to believe in any religion, and also stipulated
that there would be no single Christian denomina tion installed as a national
religion, there was no question that our laws were to be firmly based on
the Judean Ten Commandments and on Christ's mandate to love your neighbor
as you love yourself. That setup brought us amazing success as
a nation, lifting us from our humble beginnings, through crisis after crisis,
to become the leading nation of the world. Now, though, we are
throwing away the very source of our strength and greatness. Yet I am not
giving up on our country. I am encouraged at the stand and the attitude of
our president, and inspired by his courage. There are many more of his stripe
in Washington now. Though Rome and other empires have decayed and
fallen, the cultural war in the United States can and should be won by the
majority of Americans -- a majority to whom Kerry and the Democrats disdainfully
refer to as the "far right." They are people who believe in God
and in the original concept of "one nation under God."
As a nation, we are now at the point of no return. The good guys are finally angry
enough to join the fray, and I pray we are not too late. John Kerry
is not among the good guys. The Democratic Party isn't, either.
Indeed, on the subject of national security, John Kerry epitomizes a fatal weakness
in the Democratic Party. During the decisive days of the Cold War,
after the Democratic Party changed during the mid-1960s, the party was on the
wrong side of every strategic debate on policy regarding Vietnam and the USSR,
and is now generally on the wrong side in the war on terrorism.
The truth is that the Cold War was barely won by a narrow margin -- a victory
and a margin determined by the political choices made by our government regarding
suitable steps to deter Soviet attack and finally win the Cold War.
If the U.S. had followed the Democratic Party line, the Cold War would have
concluded with the U.S. having to surrender without a fight, or the U.S. would
have been defeated in a nuclear war with acceptable losses to the USSR.
It was not Johnson and Carter and the Democrats; it was Nixon, Reagan, George
Bush and the Republicans who led us to victory in the Cold War.
And George W. Bush and the Republican majority -- not John Kerry and the
Democrats -- can lead us to victory in the war on terrorism. Jeremiah
Denton is a retired Navy admiral who served in the U.S. Senate from 1981 to
1987. Readers can phone him at 473-1010, send e-mail to transff1@aol.com,
or log on to his Web site at www.nff.org. |